In the attack mode for this present
In the attack method, Nestroy was rather skillful, and even, more or even considerably less manically later, others similar to Andrew d Handke, in his / her play Offending the Market, devastatingly, it would turn up, calling them any name he could think associated with, scum, worms, monstrosities, sclerotics and syphilitics, foulmouthed ass-kissers, there, probably dead, nevertheless remarkably unoffended, even by the nonstop, incantatory, severe verbosity, as word upon word he is rapidly reversing himself. The have fun, of course—or what Handke called a Sprechstücke, a speak-in where you take a seat in, this famous actors instructed how to listen closely, this audience taught to be characters, directed from the particular stage—is genuinely some sort of talk on theater, the generally impossible cinema, which records for the logorrhea, doubtless ending representation, such as a Derridean dream, praise end up being deconstruction! contradicting itself, experimenting using play, structure, indication, together with play, a discussion with no pictures, pure beleaguered have fun with, only a world of thoughts, abolishing scopophilia within some sort of linguistic and aural room, where if an individual listen on the looking a person hear it returning. Handke asserts in a prefatory note that the Sprechstücke have nothing to accomplish along with representation, but subsequently he confesses, with some sort of ready irony, that will “they imitate the expressions connected with all the given gadgets organic to the theater”—which is why he / she says in disclaiming of which she has not being revolutionary. Typically the preface ends with the conclusive: “Speak-ins are independent commencement to the aged plays” (ix).
Which produces us back to Nestroy, whose ironies ended up nonetheless directed at, and restricted simply by, a far by autonomous theater, while inside Hapsburg Vienna, with a infection of older takes on, even those introduced while new, the glasses can be extravagant, as well as the aural room for another world involving words—upon which, simply by often the deployment of dialects, jargon, plainspoken speech, funny products to make a living, a new living they deplored, they was with ashamed veneración also making satiric struggle. It wasn't really often the war of thoughts declared at the fin via siècle by way of the much-feared, formidable, incontestable Karl Kraus, who was actually in charge for reviving Nestroy, as a greatly required, full satirical thinker, although not really perhaps with the Geist, a World-Spirit for Hegel, a mind-spirit for Kraus, an moral mastery of the Word, which Kraus advertised for himself, not simply apostolically, but as it is electronic incarnation. Nor, while he'd recovered him through oblivion simply by reading Nestroy's text messages in public, he certainly didn't want to see them within the movie theater. Opposed to this aestheticizing of instinct, by simply the Jung-Wien and Secession, Kraus also believed that the staging of a written text defiled it, and typically the purity connected with language mainly because well, thus preferable to maintain it away from often the show-off virtuosity, the self-indulgence of celebrities. Spectacular art work could be preserved, he or she insisted, by keeping the idea out of efficiency. Is actually hard to say what Nestroy may possibly have manufactured of all this, if they have true that they thought more of himself while a actor than as some sort of playwright. In that context, regardless of the rage of antitheater he might have shared together with Kraus, they was still writing tasks regarding themself, and while his very own virtuosity was running away from you with the text—the authority in the author leaving it behind —he had to take this measure of wherever that they could be performed.